WHAT’S THE PROBLEM WITH THE NEW HEAD OF ANTI-EXTREMISM ? SHE’S TOO
ANTI-EXTREMISM!
BY
MELANIE PHILLIPS
The British
government has appointed a lead commissioner for the new Commission for
Countering Extremism. She is Sara Khan, a British Muslim human rights activist
and the chief executive of Inspire, an organisation she founded in 2008 to
fight extremism and gender inequality. The decision to set up this commission
followed the Manchester bombing, one of five terror attacks in Britain in 2017.
The commission’s remit is to identify and challenge all forms of extremism,
advise ministers on anti-extremist policies and promote “pluralistic British
values”.
Sara Khan has a
track record of promoting social justice and harmony in the face of those who
would destroy them. She encourages Muslim integration into British society. She
says Muslims should obey the same laws as everyone else and has called for
honesty among Muslims about hateful ideologies and intolerant practices amongst
their number. Her opposition to the government’s badly flawed
counter-extremism bill, meanwhile, showed that she’s no government patsy. Sara
Khan would therefore seem to be an excellent choice to advise the government on
countering extremism. Her views couldn’t possibly be considered controversial
except by extremists and their apologists. So what’s the reaction of numerous
supposedly moderate British Muslim organisations and individuals? Horror!
The problem seems
to be that she has supported the government’s Prevent programme. Prevent is
designed to counter Islamic extremism. It would therefore seem somewhat
appropriate for the newly designated anti-extremism commissioner to have expressed
support for the government’s anti-Islamic extremism programme, no? No! A number
of Muslim organisations are calling for
her to be sacked and saying they won’t work with her.
Harun Khan, the
secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The
fight against terrorism requires equal partnership between all parties,
including Muslim communities.This appointment risks sending a clear and
alarming message that the government has no intention of doing so.” The former
Conservative party chairman, Sayeeda Warsi, says Sara Khan is divisive and the
appointment is “deeply disturbing”. The occupant of such a role, says Baroness
Warsi, needs to be “connected to and respected by a cross-section of British
Muslims”; but “Sara is sadly seen by many as simply a creation of and
mouthpiece for the Home Office.”
Labour MP Naz Shah,
vice-chaiman of the British Muslims all-party group, said: “Here we have
somebody who does not accept the concerns in the community.” No mention by Naz
Shah of concerns about some members of that community –
concerns which led to the creation of the commission and Sara Khan’s
appointment in the first place. Presumably that’s what “critics on social
media” mean when they claim she
has been appointed to run a “structurally Islamophobic authoritarian thought
policing commission”.
The problem with
appointing Sara Khan as the anti-extremism commissioner would therefore seem to
be that she is too… well, anti-extremism. This of course tells us nothing about
Sara Khan. It does, however, tell us rather a lot about these “moderate”
complainants – and, if their own words are correct, about the broader Muslim
community too. And none of that is good.
No comments:
Post a Comment