Wednesday, 24 February 2021

MAN OF SIN: Emmanuel Macron’s End Times Dream Of A 10-Nation European Army Gets Major Boost From European Council on Foreign Relations


New post on Now The End Begins

MAN OF SIN: Emmanuel Macron’s End Times Dream Of A 10-Nation European Army Gets Major Boost From European Council on Foreign Relations

by Geoffrey Grider


Emmanuel Macron said "I am a defender of European sovereignty, of strategic autonomy, not because I'm against NATO or because I doubt our American friends, but because I am lucid on the state of the world.

For everyone who still continues to doubt our assessment of Emmanuel Macron being the biblical man of sin from 2 Thessalonians 2, we present to you this latest update regarding Macron's plan for a United States of Europe with their own free-standing army. Now let me see, where have I read about that before?🤔 Oh wait, now I remember.

"And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast." Revelation 17:11-13 (KJB)

If you think this article is something, wait to you see the one we're working on where Macron talked back in 2017 about the 'Geist' or the spirit entering into him to propel him to take command of all of Europe. Funny thing, because that's exactly what your King James bible says will happen when the spirit of Judas Iscariot is released from 'his own place' and enters into Emmanuel Macron upgrading him from the 'man of sin' which is what he is right now, to the 'son of perdition' what he will be after we who are saved leave on Flight #777. That's how close we are. Are you ready for what comes next?

"That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fellthat he might go to his own place." Acts 1:25 (KJB)

does-king-james-bible-reveal-judas-as-antichrist-sop-son-perditionDOES THE KING JAMES BIBLE REVEAL THE IDENTITY OF THE COMING END TIMES ANTICHRIST?

Emmanuel Macron's EU army plans handed major boost - poll finds support growing

FROM DAILY EXPRESS UK: An EU army has long been contemplated in the bloc with French President Emmanuel Macron, being a key supporter of any plan. In a boost to the EU's plans, two-thirds of those surveyed in a poll from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) think-tank, were supportive of a European-level defence force. In the poll which surveyed 15,000 people, the most supportive of a defence force within the EU were found to be Portugal (72 percent), Sweden (71 percent), Spain (71 percent), France (70 percent) and Poland (69 percent).

This comes in response to many within the poll claiming they could not rely on Washington as a strategic ally. When asked on their opinion on the EU's security partnership with the US, just 10 percent viewed the US as a viable partner.

In contrast, of the 10 nations asked, 67 percent across all countries believe their own country could not rely on the US. Even in the UK, 74 percent of those asked issued their support for a EU-level defence force.

Last week Mr Macron once against issued his support for a new defence strategy which may replace NATO. During the virtual G7 Summit with other leaders, Mr Macron once again issued his call for Europe to rely on its strategic security rather than the US.


He told the Financial Times: "I am a defender of European sovereignty, of strategic autonomy, not because I'm against NATO or because I doubt our American friends, but because I am lucid on the state of the world.

"Because I think we need a fair sharing of the burden and Europe cannot delegate its protection and the protection of its neighbourhood to the USA and so we have to do it together. Nobody can tell me that today's NATO is a structure that, in its foundations, is still pertinent. It was founded to face down the Warsaw Pact. There is no more a Warsaw Pact."

France's EU Affairs minister Clement Beaune also echoed calls for an EU defence force amid the threats from China and Russia. READ MORE



Bible Prophecy Update - "Coming Soon"
Bible Prophecy Update - “Coming Soon”

Getting Ready For The Big Day
Getting Ready for the Big Day

RINOS Brett Kavanaugh And Amy Coney Barrett Side With The Other Corrupt Liberal Justices In Refusing To Hear 2020 Election Voter Fraud Cases


New post on Now The End Begins

RINOS Brett Kavanaugh And Amy Coney Barrett Side With The Other Corrupt Liberal Justices In Refusing To Hear 2020 Election Voter Fraud Cases

by Geoffrey Grider


“Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us,” Justice Clarence Thomas declared Monday, when the Supreme Court decided — by one vote –to hear none of the 2020 election cases raising issues of voter fraud and illegal votes.

I actually left the Republican Party back around 2015 after watching how the GOP let the radical Left walk all over them time and time again, I only came back to vote for Donald Trump which I did twice. So I cannot use what's happening currently as my reason for quitting the Republican Party because I am no longer a member. But I would like to draw your attention to this as further proof of election night shenanigans.

On the November 4th election night, when a handful of Democratic-run states suddenly decided to stop counting the votes, I immediately cried out 'fraud!', and no one can tell me any different. And now that the Supreme Court voted to not hear the lower court cases concerning election night and voter fraud, that tells me they are engaging in coverup. Because who wouldn't want to hear those cases, and let whatever the truth is come rising up to the surface for all to see? That would settle the question forever, instead we now have yet another conspiracy theory verified.

Clarence Thomas Dissent in Election Cases: ‘Our Fellow Citizens Deserve Better’

FROM BREITBART NEWS: Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with the liberal justices to deny review of the lower court decisions. Four justices must vote to hear a case to put it on the Court’s docket, but only three justices — Thomas, fellow conservative Samuel Alito, and libertarian Neil Gorsuch — voted to take at least two of four of the key cases from November 2020.

All three dissenting justices took the unusual step of writing opinions as to why the Court should have taken at minimum two of these cases.

“The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the ‘Manner’ of federal elections,” began Thomas. “Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emergency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example.”

“The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days,” Thomas explained, referring to one of the rejected cases. “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

“For more than a century, this Court has recognized that the Constitution operates as a limitation upon the State in respect of any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power to regulate federal elections,” he continued, quoting Supreme Court precedent. “Because the Federal Constitution, not state constitutions, gives state legislatures authority to regulate federal elections, petitioners presented a strong argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision violated the Constitution by overriding the clearly expressed intent of the legislature.” 

“But elections enable self-governance only when they include processes that give citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election,” Thomas added, quoting a recent Supreme Court case that held, “Confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy.” 

“Unclear rules threaten to undermine this system. They sow confusion and ultimately dampen confidence in the integrity and fairness of elections,” he explained. “To prevent confusion, we have thus repeatedly — although not as consistently as we should — blocked rule changes made by courts close to an election.”

as-antifa-black-lives-matter-burn-american-flag-washington-dc-democrats-trying-to-rig-election-results-vote-counting-for-joe-biden-donald-trumpAS LEFTISTS BURN THE AMERICAN FLAG IN WASHINGTON, DEMOCRAT-RUN STATES RIGHT NOW ATTEMPTING TO RIG ELECTION RESULTS IN JOE BIDEN’S FAVOR

The mail-deadline case did not impact enough votes to change the 2020 election. “But we may not be so lucky in the future,” Thomas warned. “Indeed, a separate decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court may have already altered an election result.”

Thomas surmised:

That is not a prescription for confidence. Changing the rules in the middle of the game is bad enough. Such rule changes by officials who may lack authority to do so is even worse. When those changes alter election results, they can severely damage the electoral system on which our self-governance so heavily depends. If state officials have the authority they have claimed, we need to make it clear. If not, we need to put an end to this practice now before the consequences become catastrophic. 

“At first blush, it may seem reasonable to address this question when it next arises,” he aknowledged. “But whatever force that argument has in other contexts, it fails in the context of elections.”

“For factually complex cases, compressing discovery, testimony, and appeals into this timeline is virtually impossible,” Thomas explained of the five-week window to resolve November presidential election disputes before the Electoral College meets in December, adding “this timeframe imposes especially daunting constraints when combined with the expanded use of mail-in ballots.” 

“Voting by mail was traditionally limited to voters who had defined, well-documented reasons to be absent,” he observed, but then noted that while only four percent of Pennsylvania votes were by mail-in ballot last cycle, that the number soared to 38 percent in 2020. 

“This expansion impedes postelection judicial review because litigation about mail-in ballots is substantially more complicated,” Thomas continued, quoting expert reports. “For one thing, as election administrators have long agreed, the risk of fraud is vastly more prevalent for mail-in ballots … The reason is simple: Absentee voting replaces the oversight that exists at polling places with something akin to an honor system.” 

As a result, one article concluded that, “voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner.” 

“Because fraud is more prevalent with mail-in ballots, increased use of those ballots raises the likelihood that courts will be asked to adjudicate questions that go to the heart of election confidence,” Thomas reasoned after examining several examples.

“Perhaps most significant, postelection litigation sometimes forces courts to make policy decisions that they have no business making,” Thomas added, giving the example that when election officials illegally change rules during an election where some voters have already voted, “courts must choose between potentially disenfranchising a subset of voters and enforcing the election provisions — such as receipt deadlines — that the legislature believes are necessary for election integrity.”

Filing lawsuits after Election Day “is often incapable of testing allegations of systemic maladministration, voter suppression, or fraud that go to the heart of public confidence in election results,” Thomas noted as additional reason to decide these legal issues now. “An incorrect allegation, left to fester without a robust mechanism to test and disprove it, drives honest citizens out of the democratic process and breeds distrust of our government.” 

“Because the judicial system is not well suited to address these kinds of questions in the short time period available immediately after an election, we ought to use available cases outside that truncated context to address these admittedly important questions,” Thomas declared. “Here, we have the opportunity to do so almost two years before the next federal election cycle. Our refusal to do so by hearing these cases is befuddling.”

“The issue presented is capable of repetition, yet evades review,” Thomas determined, citing the Court’s standard for hearing cases of this nature:

This exception to mootness, which the Court routinely invokes in election cases, “applies where (1) the challenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to cessation or expiration, and (2) there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party will be subject to the same action again. 

“I agree with JUSTICE THOMAS that we should grant review in these cases,” Alito began in a separate dissent, joined by Gorsuch. “They present an important and recurring constitutional question … that has divided the lower courts, and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial.”

Quoting the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s concurring opinion from the 2000 case Bush v. Gore, Alito continued:

Now, the election is over, and there is no reason for refusing to decide the important question that these cases pose. The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election. But a decision would provide invaluable guidance for future elections. 

“Conservatives will be very concerned that Justice Barrett did not provide the fourth and final vote to take these cases,” former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell—who also served on the Presidential Commission on Election Integrity—told Breitbart News in an exclusive reaction to the Supreme Court’s refusal to take any of these cases. “Republicans have long since written off Roberts, and Kavanaugh is giving us a string of disappointments, but this is the first time that Barrett has failed to step up to the plate.”

He echoed Thomas, who concluded his dissent with:

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent. 

The cases are Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid and Corman v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party, Nos. 20-542 and 20-574 in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court also denied review in the similar case Donald J. Trump for President v. Degraffenreid and Trump v. Biden, and Nos. 20-845 and 20-882 in the Supreme Court of the United States. READ MORE

Audio: Muslim Persecution of Christians with R. Ibrahim on KSFR’s ‘Wake Up Call’ by Raymond Ibrahim


New post on Raymond Ibrahim

Audio: Muslim Persecution of Christians with R. Ibrahim on KSFR’s ‘Wake Up Call’

by Raymond Ibrahim

KSFR 101.1's "Wake Up Call" with MK Mendoza interviewed me last week on a variety of topics dealing with the ongoing phenomenon of Muslim persecution of Christians.  Click here to listen to both Parts 1 and 2 of the interview.  

Read more of this post

RIDICULOUS: Palestinian Official Claims Israel will Bomb Judaism’s Holiest Site


WATCH: Terrorists Plant Bombs in Mediterranean; Russia Airs Rare Footage of Israeli Spy in Syria; Why Do We Wear Purim Costumes? Latest from Israel!
United with IsraelIsraeli Judoka Defeats Rival in 18 Seconds! Surprise: Purim is Equal to Yom Kippur! Getting Ready: Why Do We Wear Purim Costumes? Now is the Time: Remember to Destroy Amalek; The Deeper Meaning of Purim Told in Animation
RIDICULOUS: Palestinian Official Claims Israel will Bomb Judaism’s Holiest Site
Israel Demands NBC Apologize for Anti-Semitic Skit
WATCH: Terrorists Plant Bombs in Mediterranean

Netanyahu’s Biblical Warning to Iran’s Rulers


Israel Shocked by Deaths of Young Mother, Fetus; Civil Rights Advocate Blasted for This Outrageous Accusation Against Jews; Latest Israel News!
World Israel News
Netanyahu’s Biblical Warning to Iran’s Rulers
Top Civil Rights Advocate Blasted for This Outrageous Accusation Against Orthodox Jews 

Tuesday, 23 February 2021

Military Anti-Extremism Order Fails To Identify The Target


Military Anti-Extremism Order Fails To Identify The Target
The military already does a good job weeding out those associated with the KKK or other white supremacist groups. The only thing this new order accomplishes is to open the door to hazy definitions of a broader, and more sinister, interpretation -- targeting social conservatives.

Study: Most Biden Voters Don't Know Scripture
According to a new report, President Biden's base of supporters is 60 percent less likely to hold a biblical worldview, and although nearly two-thirds (65 percent) consider themselves to be Christian, many of their beliefs are contradictory to traditional biblical teaching.
Biden Expected To Keep Israel Policy In Holding Pattern For The Time Being
So, what does the new administration of President Joe Biden, Obama's vice president, mean for Israel's future? For starters, a second life for that bad Iran deal.
Lessons From Texas: US Infrastructure More Vulnerable Than We Ever Imagined
We are getting a very short preview of what will eventually happen to the United States as a whole. America's infrastructure is aging and crumbling and Texas just showed us exactly what can go wrong when the unexpected happens.



New post on Now The End Begins

One Week After Jews Cry Out For Antichrist, Pope Francis Will Hold A Chrislam One World Religion Prayer Meeting In Ur Where Abraham Was Born

by Geoffrey Grider


Pope Francis is due to hold an inter-religious Chrislam prayer service at the ancient Mesopotamian site of Ur when he visits Iraq next week – an event local archeologists hope will draw renewed attention to the place revered as the birthplace of Abraham.

Pope Francis is sending another shot across the bow as he continues to work assembling the One World Religion of Chrislam foretold in bible prophecy. This time he is bringing his end times road show to the birthplace of Abraham in Iraq at Ur of the Chaldees. Abraham in the bible is at the head of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and he will retain his 'top of the pyramid' status as his name is claimed for the Abraham Accords, the Abrahamic Family House and the Abrahamic Faiths Initiative.

"Thou art the LORD the God, who didst choose Abram, and broughtest him forth out of Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham;" Nehemiah 9:7 (KJB)

This month it's the 2-year anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Human Fraternity, the end times covenant that birthed the official kick-off of Chrislam in Abu Dhabi with Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb. Hard to believe it's two years already, isn't it? Yesterday, orthodox Jews began praying for Antichrist to come, next week the False Prophet will hold a Chrislam One World Religion conclave in Ur, and tomorrow? It just might be Flight #777 taking off, hope you're ready to fly.

The United Arab Emirates will build a new synagogue as part of an Chrislam interfaith compound that will also house a mosque and church and is reportedly set to open in 2022.EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ONE WORLD RELIGION OF CHRISLAM IS JUST A CLICK AWAY

Pope Francis Holding Chrislam Event In Abraham's Birthplace Of Ur Of The Chaldees At Ziggurat In Iraq

FROM BRITISH HERALD: Located about 300 km (200 miles) south of the capital Baghdad, the site comprises a pyramid-style Ziggurat and an adjacent residential complex as well as temples and palaces. It was excavated about 100 years ago by Leonard Woolley, a Briton who recovered treasures rivalling those found in Tutankhamen’s tomb in Egypt. But little work has since been done on one of the world’s oldest cities, where urban dwelling, writing and central state power began. According to the State Board for Antiquities and Heritage director for Ur, Ali Kadhim Ghanim, the complex next to the Ziggurat dates back to about 1900 BC.

The inter-religious prayer service will be attended by Christians, Muslims, Mandaean-Sabaean, Yazidi and other religious minorities present in Iraq. The focus will be on harmony between religious groups in a service the Vatican has named “Prayer for the sons and daughters of Abraham”.

The father of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, Abraham is described in the biblical book of Genesis as living in the city before God called upon him to create a new nation in a land he later learned was Canaan.

“This is why it is believed that this building, or house, was the house of the prophet Abraham,” Ghanim said, pointing at the residential complex.

According to Ghanim, the housing settlement was restored in 1999, after Pope Francis’ predecessor, Pope John Paul II, announced a trip to Iraq. But his visit was cancelled when negotiations with the government of then-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein broke down.

This time, Ghanim hopes that Pope Francis’ visit will attract international attention to the site, which he says is badly needed to fund restoration works on its palaces and temples.

“Not only tourism, but we believe that there will be a Christian pilgrimage season,” Ghanim said.

Un Ponte Per, an Italian-based organization, is working with the United Nations Development Programme on infrastructure works such as paths, rest areas and signposts to help visitors. Roads around the site are being renovated and powerlines extended ahead of the pope’s visit.

But without adequate funding, Ghanim says his administration has been limited to containing further damage to the site, such as digging trenches to divert rainwater from the ruins. Basra’s Archbishop Habib al-Naufaly stressed the symbolic importance of the pope’s March 5-8 visit as Iraq is still recovering from the war against Islamic State that destroyed scores of Christian heritage sites. READ MORE



Prophecy Update Top News Headlines - 2/22/21
The Prophecy Update Top News Headlines - 2/22/21

Prophecy Update - Current Events - 2/21/21
Prophecy Update Current Events - 2/21/21