A Harvard Medical School department Twitter account referred to women as “birthing people” in a tweet, and claimed that “not all who give birth” are women.
Can a man ever, at any time and under any conditions, give birth to a baby? As DL Moody used to say, "no, NO, a THOUSAND times no!". Why? Because men have no uterus, no vagina, and nothing in their DNA which would allow for the creation, formation and gestation of a living, human being. Does 'identifying" as someone of a different gender make you that gender? Try this experiment and see. When it comes time to pay your monthly bills, simply 'identify' as a 'person of wealth', write, sign and send the checks, and see what happens. That'll be your answer as to whether or not identifying as something makes you that thing.
"And they will deceive every one his neighbour, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, and weary themselves to commit iniquity. Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the LORD." Jeremiah 9:5,6 (KJB)
When I was a kid, attending Harvard Medical School implied two readily-accepted truths. One that you had lots of money, and two, that you were pretty smart. In 2021, it seems that while it still takes truckloads of money to get into Harvard, intelligence is no longer part of the criteria. This is a plan to dehumanize both men and women, as if abortion wasn't already dehumanizing enough, and get you to accept lies for truth. When that plan is fully implemented, life on earth will become intolerable and unmanageable. It will literally be George Orwell's 'double think' come to life, with one exception. Long before Orwell wrote about it, the prophets in the Bible already tried to prepare you for it.
"And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done." Daniel 11:36 (KJB)
Harvard Panel Claims ‘Not All Who Give Birth’ Are Women, Uses Term ‘Birthing People’
FROM BREITBART NEWS: “Globally, ethnic minority pregnant and birthing people suffer worse outcomes and experiences during and after pregnancy and childbirth,” tweeted Harvard Med Postgraduate and Continuing Education in November, promoting a panel on “maternal justice.”
“These inequities have been further highlighted by #COVID19,” continued the tweet, which included a link to Harvard Medical School’s “Health Disparities Resources for Providers.”
After being called out by social media users for referring to women as “birthing people,” the Harvard Med Postgraduate Twitter account posted a follow-up tweet, explaining why such verbiage was used.
“The webinar panelists used the term ‘birthing person’ to include those who identify as non-binary or transgender because not all who give birth identify as ‘women’ or ‘girls,'” the account explains in its follow-up tweet. “We understand the reactions to this terminology and in no way meant for it to erase or dehumanize women,” the tweet adds.
Moreover, the panel on “Maternal Justice Across the Atlantic: Race, Pregnancy and Birth Equity in the United States and Great Britain” — hosted on Harvard’s website — also refers to women as “birthing people.”
Over the summer, Harvard, which is ranked as number one in Best Education Schools in the United States, according to US News and World Report, promoted the claim that “2+2=5.”
“Have you ever thought to yourself, ‘How do I know that 2+2=4? Why isn’t it 2+2+5?'” inquired Harvard’s T. H. Chan School of Public Health in an August tweet, sharing an article from Popular Mechanics, entitled, “Why Some People Think 2+2=5… and why they’re right.” READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment