by Fred DeRuvo
What can be gained by drugging society?
The globalization of the world continues unabated. It's as if the Global Elite (GE) have garnered enough speed to throw off anything that attempts to slow them down. This is bad news for the world, but certainly good news for the GE.
The GE seems to have matters under control (though to many of us, much of the world appears to be experiencing various forms of chaos). They essentially own all of the media in America and in many places throughout the world. They own nearly all the corporations of the world, though on paper, it still appears as though many companies are independently owned. They own the pharmaceutical companies and have taken over the medical industry because of it. It's all very handy...for them.
As early as 1908, the Rockefellers found a way to combine their holdings in the chemical field with the untapped medical field that they wished to control. They did this - according to one source[1] by surreptitiously paying for a study to be done. The resultant Flexner Report essentially panned medical education and techniques done at that time. It essentially gave birth to
modern medical techniques.
"In the late 1800s and early 1900s there were many schools that taught Eclectic medicine (botanical and herbal medicine), Holistic medicine, and Naturopathy. These schools were not in line with the pharmaceutical drug-pushing agenda of the Rockefellers and AMA. Because these schools did not sit well with the Flexnor (sic) report, they were not allowed accreditation."
The Rockefeller family began to combine their resources with a then untapped commodity, pharmacy. If they could make billions from the oil industry and the other chemicals connected to that, then why couldn't they make billions off of pharmaceuticals as well? In order to make this happen, the Flexner Report was used to force medical schools that still taught medicine the "old-fashioned" way to rid themselves of these "antiquated" programs or close.
"[Abraham Flexner decided] any approach to medicine that did not advocate the use of treatments such as vaccines to prevent and cure illness as tantamount to quackery and charlatanism. Medical schools that offered training in various disciplines including eclectic medicine, physiomedicalism, naturopathy, and homeopathy, were told either to drop these courses from their curriculum or lose their accreditation and underwriting support."
Today, naturopathic medicine is often seen as quackery. Unfortunately, because many states don't offer any form of oversight, nearly anyone can get a license and call themselves a naturopathic doctor. There are some genuine individuals out there, but too often, the patient needs to spend a good amount of time searching. The proliferation of unqualified individuals telling people which supplements to take and what they should do to gain and maintain good health exists by design by those who want to ensure that this area of medicine is ridiculed and looked down upon.
What does the actual medical industry benefit from having naturopathic doctors doubted and ridiculed? The better question is how does the pharmaceutical industry benefit from putting down the naturopathic medical professionals?
If we consider the fact that pharmaceutical companies sold just under
$300 billion worth of medications in 2008, we can begin to understand what the pharmacy companies stand to lose if people began eating right, exercising, and taking the correct supplements in the right dosage instead of relying on expensive drugs. Unlike prescription drugs, most supplements are far less expensive and don't require a co-pay.
Red Yeast Rice is a supplement commonly available just about anywhere. It has been used in China for centuries without any problems for reducing cholesterol. In fact,
studies have shown that it is very capable of reducing high cholesterol levels. What's the problem?
Well, a number of years ago, when the supplement first arrived in the U.S. and people began using it with the intended results, things were fine for a while, then the FDA stepped in. Because Red Yeast Rice has naturally occurring lovastin, which incidentally, is a drug produced by big pharma. The FDA went to court to have Red Yeast Rice pulled from store shelves. Initially, they won, but a few years later, a higher court overturned that ruling.
However, in the meantime, companies did what they could to remove the lovastin from Red Yeast Rice. The FDA, now believing that the supplement was essentially no longer a drug (and therefore, no longer a competitor to the pharmacy companies) didn't fight the new ruling.
However, it turns out that even when manufacturers removed the lovastin, apparently not all of it can be removed from Red Yeast Rice without completely destroying the product. In essence then, those who take Red Yeast Rice today will still benefit from the supplement for its cholesterol-reducing ability.
Why then did the FDA do what it did to get Red Yeast Rice removed from store shelves? We can either believe they did it because they actually care about consumer health or - far more likely - they did what they did because they want to protect big pharma. Which do you think is the more logical?
Let's make a huge leap. Let's argue that the pharmaceutical companies really want to sell drugs. Isn't that why they exist? Could it be then that the people who own these pharmaceutical companies tend to gain quite a bit from that and we're not simply talking about money? We're also talking about control.
Is it possible that the Global Elite wants to control the population and the best way to do that is to drug as many people as possible, causing them to experience sometimes disabling side-effects and even death from these "safe" drugs? If patients don't die, might it simply be good enough to have them weakened to the point where they cannot resist what the GE is attempting to accomplish?
No comments:
Post a Comment